14 Jan 2016
Arguments in favour of RMB devaluation - Nomura
FXStreet (Guatemala) - Analysts at Nomura offered arguments in favour of a very large one-off RMB devaluation.
Key Quotes:
"Include: 1) in real effective terms, the RMB has appreciated 54% in the past decade; 2) China’s exports are weak and inflation is low; an over-reliance on domestic easing policies risks creating bigger bubbles.
However, we see more compelling arguments against: 1) real effective exchange rate appreciation has been associated with strong productivity gains, such that China has been gaining export market share; 2) China’s exports still have a large share of imported inputs, so the boost to GDP growth would be limited; 3) it would not support a rebalancing of GDP toward consumption; 4) it could create turmoil in Asia’s markets in a year that China is chairing the G20; 5) it could cause credit stress on FX debt; 6) it could provoke a self- fulfilling spiral of hot money outflows by residents who are still very underexposed to foreign assets; and 7) It could affect policy credibility given leadership’s comments of no devaluation and 8) there would be a risk of a protectionist backlash."
Key Quotes:
"Include: 1) in real effective terms, the RMB has appreciated 54% in the past decade; 2) China’s exports are weak and inflation is low; an over-reliance on domestic easing policies risks creating bigger bubbles.
However, we see more compelling arguments against: 1) real effective exchange rate appreciation has been associated with strong productivity gains, such that China has been gaining export market share; 2) China’s exports still have a large share of imported inputs, so the boost to GDP growth would be limited; 3) it would not support a rebalancing of GDP toward consumption; 4) it could create turmoil in Asia’s markets in a year that China is chairing the G20; 5) it could cause credit stress on FX debt; 6) it could provoke a self- fulfilling spiral of hot money outflows by residents who are still very underexposed to foreign assets; and 7) It could affect policy credibility given leadership’s comments of no devaluation and 8) there would be a risk of a protectionist backlash."